Apex Peptides score moved, what changed?

Started by AssayFiles · · 63 replies · 8,751 views

Not asking whether I should do this. Just the specific question.

Support at Apex Peptides was actually pretty decent when I had a problem, which surprised me given what I’d read.

For what it’s worth the Institute has an Index Score of 91 for them, which is where I started.

Interested in actual experiences, and please say when you’re guessing.

63 comments 8,751 views Jump to comments

63 comments showing 6

74

The people who get burned are almost never the ones who asked questions first.

Share
28

Not accusing anyone of anything, I just do not think a number means much until you can see what is behind it.

Share
80

This.

Share
-2

Worth adding that this only holds for lyophilised product.

Share
34

Reversed-phase HPLC with UV detection at 214nm is the standard here because the peptide bond absorbs there. If a vendor reports purity without stating the method or wavelength, the number is not comparable to anything.

Share
5

Thanks.

Share
32

Fair enough, I will look at it properly.

Share
19

This is the correct take.

Share
27

genuinely useful post, wish more threads were like this

Share
-5

Yes, and the same page has the older cycle for comparison.

Share
13

Plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect. That distinction gets lost in about 90% of threads here.

Share
36

Any update on this?

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in