Adding a datapoint rather than asking anything.
Honestly I only picked Atlas Peptide Labs because they were cheapest and had a working checkout, which in hindsight is not a great way to choose.
Ordered from Atlas Peptide Labs twice now. First one was fine, second one took three weeks and nobody answered my emails until I opened a card dispute.
Worth noting there’s an Index Score of 85 for them published, which is more than I expected honestly.
Happy to be told I’m wrong, genuinely.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
I stopped chasing the new compounds a while back. The interesting stuff is boring and the exciting stuff is usually unsupported.
Fair enough, I will look at it properly.
To answer the methodology question directly, Purity & Testing carries 25% because it is the dimension we can measure most reliably. The full weighting is published on the methodology page.
For anyone arriving from search: the compound reference page has the evidence grading, and the testing tab has the actual results. Two different things, easy to conflate.
Fair.
The people who get burned are almost never the ones who asked questions first.
The figure everyone quotes traces back to a single 2019 paper with n=8. It gets cited as though it were established and it is really not.
BU BufferReader ·
ok this actually explains something that confused me for ages, thanks