Searched first, found bits of this scattered across old threads, so figured I’d start a proper one.
I’ve changed my mind on this twice in the last year so take my current position lightly.
Curious how other people think about this, because I keep going back and forth.
Anyway. Curious what everyone else has seen.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
We publish failed results the same way we publish passing ones. If a company disputes a finding, that goes on the record too.
tbh half the vendor sites look like they were built by the same guy
Batch-to-batch variation is the thing people underestimate. A passing result certifies one lot, not a product line, and vendors know most buyers do not make that distinction.
For anyone arriving from search: the compound reference page has the evidence grading, and the testing tab has the actual results. Two different things, easy to conflate.
Saved.
CO ColdNerd ·
this is why i just stick to the boring stuff now