Transparency question: how is the Institute funded?

Started by signal_cleo · · 49 replies · 6,943 views

methodology

Searched first, found bits of this scattered across old threads, so figured I’d start a proper one.

This is the sort of thing that never gets written down anywhere so I figured I’d ask.

I’ve changed my mind on this twice in the last year so take my current position lightly.

Thanks in advance, this community is usually pretty good about this stuff.

49 comments 6,943 views Jump to comments

49 comments showing 4

13

The effect size in that study was statistically significant and clinically trivial. Those are not the same finding and the abstract does not make the difference obvious.

Share
13

Worth adding that this only holds for lyophilised product.

Share
55

That is a better argument than the one above it.

Share
46

Good thread.

Share
1

ha, fair

Share
44

yeah exactly this

Share
73

Plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect. That distinction gets lost in about 90% of threads here.

Share
2

Happy to walk through how to read one of those reports if it would help. It is less intimidating than it looks once you know which three numbers matter.

Share
-4

wait really? ok that changes things

Share
80

Happy to dig up the link if you want it.

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in