Does the rodent data on Thymalin translate at all?

Started by AssayJournal Moderator · · 27 replies · 3,168 views

Someone talk me out of this.

So I’ve been reading about Thymalin for a few weeks now and the more I read the less confident I am that anyone actually knows what they’re talking about.

What bugs me about Thymalin is how confident everyone is. Nobody hedges. Everyone has a protocol.

Genuinely open to being corrected on this.

27 comments 3,168 views Jump to comments

27 comments showing 6

13

Batch-to-batch variation is the thing people underestimate. A passing result certifies one lot, not a product line, and vendors know most buyers do not make that distinction.

Share
25

wait really? ok that changes things

Share
73

idk man the more i read about this stuff the less i trust any of it

Share
73

Yes, and the same page has the older cycle for comparison.

Share
4

Still not convinced but I take the point.

Share
1

Answered your second question in a DM since it was getting long, but short version is yes with caveats.

Share
4

This is the correct take.

Share
30

Quantitative amino acid analysis is what actually verifies content. Weighing the lyophilised powder does not, because you are also weighing residual salts and moisture.

Share
83

The effect size in that study was statistically significant and clinically trivial. Those are not the same finding and the abstract does not make the difference obvious.

Share
18

Agreed.

Share
33

same boat honestly

Share
4

Testing desk here. Every specimen page links the full laboratory report, including the method and the lot. If something in one of them is unclear, say which and we will explain it.

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in