Fair warning, this is long. Summary at the end.
Half of what’s written about PT-141 online is copied from the same three forum posts from 2019. I can’t find an original source for most of it.
Every vendor page for PT-141 says basically the same thing in the same order, which makes me think none of them wrote it.
What bugs me about PT-141 is how confident everyone is. Nobody hedges. Everyone has a protocol.
For what it’s worth the Institute has 6 published tests on PT-141, which is where I started.
The part I keep getting stuck on is that everyone’s confident and nobody agrees, which usually means the evidence is thinner than the discussion.
TL;DR: PT-141 might be fine, might not, and the way to tell apart seems to be documentation rather than price. Would appreciate other perspectives.
KI kinetic_anton · · 14 found helpful
wait so does that mean the coa is basically useless? genuine q