GHK-Cu sourcing megathread | The Peptide Institute

Searched first, found bits of this scattered across old threads, so figured I’d start a proper one.

I’m not a scientist. I can read an abstract and roughly follow it but that’s about my limit with GHK-Cu.

Half of what’s written about GHK-Cu online is copied from the same three forum posts from 2019. I can’t find an original source for most of it.

The Institute testing page has 4 published tests on GHK-Cu if you want actual numbers rather than vibes.

Thanks in advance, this community is usually pretty good about this stuff.

94 comments 13,376 views Jump to comments

94 comments showing 6

dev_phd 2y ago

The people who get burned are almost never the ones who asked questions first.

isotope_dev 2y ago

wait really? ok that changes things

VialMethod 2y ago 18 found helpful

Correct, and the same applies to the quantity assay.

buffer_nils 2y ago

same boat honestly

BatchReport 2y ago 15 found helpful

This.

ColdChainKate 2y ago

ha, fair

batch_aria 2y ago

That is the distinction I was trying to make, said better.

TitrationData 2y ago

Happy to dig up the link if you want it.

AriaMethod 2y ago

The specimen reports link out to the full lab document, including the method and the lot number. Took me a while to notice they were clickable.

-7

ResearchRN 2y ago

If you want to check this yourself, ask the vendor which laboratory issued the certificate, then email that laboratory with the report number. Most will confirm or deny. The ones that go quiet tell you something.

reagent_rhea 2y ago

The methodology page covers the weighting question directly. Purity gets the largest share because it is the most reliably measurable thing they assess.

-7

ProtocolReader Verified 2y ago 27 found helpful

Any update on this?

AssayReader 2y ago 13 found helpful

Thanks.

LabNotes Verified 2y ago

Good point.

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in