I’ll probably get downvoted for this.
So I’ve been reading about GHRP-6 for a few weeks now and the more I read the less confident I am that anyone actually knows what they’re talking about.
Anyway. Flame away.
I’ll probably get downvoted for this.
So I’ve been reading about GHRP-6 for a few weeks now and the more I read the less confident I am that anyone actually knows what they’re talking about.
Anyway. Flame away.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
Who funded the study though. That is usually the first thing worth checking and almost nobody does.
Happy to dig up the link if you want it.
For anyone arriving from search: the compound reference page has the evidence grading, and the testing tab has the actual results. Two different things, easy to conflate.
Batch-to-batch variation is the thing people underestimate. A passing result certifies one lot, not a product line, and vendors know most buyers do not make that distinction.
Mass spec gives you molecular weight, which confirms identity but says nothing about whether the sequence is correct. Two different peptides can share a mass.
Watched three vendors rebrand under new names after bad results. Check domain registration dates.
wait really? ok that changes things
BA BaselineReport Mod ·
Institute account. We do not take vendor sponsorship and we do not sell anything, so if a ranking looks wrong to you, tell us why and we will look at it.