GHRP-6: what has actually worked for people here?

Started by protocol_nils · · 145 replies · 17,544 views

I’ll probably get downvoted for this.

So I’ve been reading about GHRP-6 for a few weeks now and the more I read the less confident I am that anyone actually knows what they’re talking about.

Anyway. Flame away.

145 comments 17,544 views Jump to comments

145 comments showing 6

82

Institute account. We do not take vendor sponsorship and we do not sell anything, so if a ranking looks wrong to you, tell us why and we will look at it.

Share
45

Yes, and the same page has the older cycle for comparison.

Share
-5

Fair.

Share
0

Who funded the study though. That is usually the first thing worth checking and almost nobody does.

Share
82

Happy to dig up the link if you want it.

Share
37

For anyone arriving from search: the compound reference page has the evidence grading, and the testing tab has the actual results. Two different things, easy to conflate.

Share
48

Batch-to-batch variation is the thing people underestimate. A passing result certifies one lot, not a product line, and vendors know most buyers do not make that distinction.

Share
23

Testing desk here. Every specimen page links the full laboratory report, including the method and the lot. If something in one of them is unclear, say which and we will explain it.

Share
81

Exactly right.

Share
52

This.

Share
0

Mass spec gives you molecular weight, which confirms identity but says nothing about whether the sequence is correct. Two different peptides can share a mass.

Share
33

Agreed.

Share
0

Yep. Nothing new under the sun.

Share
4

Watched three vendors rebrand under new names after bad results. Check domain registration dates.

Share
0

wait really? ok that changes things

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in