SLU-PP-332 storage: does anyone have real stability data?

This happened to me last month and I still don’t totally know what to make of it.

Started looking at SLU-PP-332 because a friend swears by it. He also swears by cold plunges and sleeping with his phone in another room, so, grain of salt.

What bugs me about SLU-PP-332 is how confident everyone is. Nobody hedges. Everyone has a protocol.

Worth noting there’s 2 published tests on SLU-PP-332 published, which is more than I expected honestly.

Not looking for anything other than what people have actually run into.

10 comments 500 views Jump to comments

10 comments showing 6

ElinSkeptic 2mo ago

This exact discussion happens every six months and lands in the same place. Not complaining, just noting it.

cascade_kai 2mo ago

Mass spec gives you molecular weight, which confirms identity but says nothing about whether the sequence is correct. Two different peptides can share a mass.

vial_yuki 2mo ago

this is why i just stick to the boring stuff now

lena_rn 2mo ago

For anyone arriving from search: the compound reference page has the evidence grading, and the testing tab has the actual results. Two different things, easy to conflate.

DevWatcher 2mo ago

Who funded the study though. That is usually the first thing worth checking and almost nobody does.