Critical read: the KPV literature is thinner than it looks

Started by sam7 · · 4 replies · 836 views

KPV methodology

Mild rant, feel free to ignore.

Most of what gets cited for this traces back to one group publishing in the same journal repeatedly. That’s not damning on its own but it’s worth knowing.

Spent an evening trying to actually read the papers instead of reading about the papers and it was humbling.

Anyway. Flame away.

4 comments 836 views Jump to comments

4 comments showing 4

-4

This exact discussion happens every six months and lands in the same place. Not complaining, just noting it.

Share
0

Commenting to find later.

Share
1

Yep. Nothing new under the sun.

Share
-8

This is the correct take.

Share
20

Flagging that we have re-tested this product from a separate lot at a second laboratory. Both results are published.

Share
35

Saved.

Share
2

Worth adding that this only holds for lyophilised product.

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in