This has come up like three times in the last month so it probably deserves its own thread.
The gap between what the study measured and what people claim it showed is genuinely enormous.
Rodent study. Always a rodent study. I’m not saying that makes it worthless, I’m saying I wish people led with it.
Interested in actual experiences, and please say when you’re guessing.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
What would actually change your mind here? If nothing would, it is not really an evidence question.
Respectfully I think you are reading more into that result than it supports.
oh that makes way more sense, cheers
Bumping.
Batch-to-batch variation is the thing people underestimate. A passing result certifies one lot, not a product line, and vendors know most buyers do not make that distinction.
KI KineticData ·
Who funded the study though. That is usually the first thing worth checking and almost nobody does.