Does anyone have full-text access to the Oxytocin papers?

Started by BatchReport · · 145 replies · 18,384 views

Oxytocin methodology

Long post, sorry. TL;DR at the bottom if you don’t want the whole thing.

The gap between what the study measured and what people claim it showed is genuinely enormous.

Rodent study. Always a rodent study. I’m not saying that makes it worthless, I’m saying I wish people led with it.

Most of what gets cited for this traces back to one group publishing in the same journal repeatedly. That’s not damning on its own but it’s worth knowing.

The part I keep getting stuck on is that everyone’s confident and nobody agrees, which usually means the evidence is thinner than the discussion.

TL;DR: I went looking for a straight answer on Oxytocin and came back with more questions. Details above.

145 comments 18,384 views Jump to comments

145 comments showing 4

0

Solid write up.

Share
4

Plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect. That distinction gets lost in about 90% of threads here.

Share
24

Fair.

Share
7

Short answer: check that the lot number on the certificate matches the lot printed on your vial. If it does not, the document is about different material.

Share
33

Yes, and the same page has the older cycle for comparison.

Share
23

Testing desk here. Every specimen page links the full laboratory report, including the method and the lot. If something in one of them is unclear, say which and we will explain it.

Share
29

Worth clarifying since it comes up a lot: a company's score moves when new results come in, not on a schedule. The score history on each profile shows every change.

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in