Figured I’d write this up while it’s fresh.
The gap between what the study measured and what people claim it showed is genuinely enormous.
Spent an evening trying to actually read the papers instead of reading about the papers and it was humbling.
If this has already been answered somewhere just point me at it.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
The effect size in that study was statistically significant and clinically trivial. Those are not the same finding and the abstract does not make the difference obvious.
If your solution went cloudy after reconstitution that is usually either the diluent or the temperature it was stored at. Worth posting what you used.
Thanks.
The specimen reports link out to the full lab document, including the method and the lot number. Took me a while to notice they were clickable.
Good thread.
AN AntonCheck Verified ·
Any update on this?