IGF-1 LR3, which studies are actually worth reading?

Started by ColdChainKate · · 15 replies · 1,609 views

IGF-1 LR3 methodology

Not a complaint, just documenting it in case it’s useful to someone.

The gap between what the study measured and what people claim it showed is genuinely enormous.

Most of what gets cited for this traces back to one group publishing in the same journal repeatedly. That’s not damning on its own but it’s worth knowing.

Not looking for anything other than what people have actually run into.

15 comments 1,609 views Jump to comments

15 comments showing 3

9

Quantitative amino acid analysis is what actually verifies content. Weighing the lyophilised powder does not, because you are also weighing residual salts and moisture.

Share
-3

Bumping.

Share
5

this is why i just stick to the boring stuff now

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in