Figured I’d write this up while it’s fresh.
Most of what gets cited for this traces back to one group publishing in the same journal repeatedly. That’s not damning on its own but it’s worth knowing.
Rodent study. Always a rodent study. I’m not saying that makes it worthless, I’m saying I wish people led with it.
Happy to be told I’m wrong, genuinely.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
The specimen reports link out to the full lab document, including the method and the lot number. Took me a while to notice they were clickable.
Source though?
Mass spec gives you molecular weight, which confirms identity but says nothing about whether the sequence is correct. Two different peptides can share a mass.
KI kinetic_yuki ·
Been doing this about four years. The vendors that publish batch documents are the ones that hold up. That is basically the whole heuristic and it has not failed me yet.