Been lurking a while, first time posting.
Spent an evening trying to actually read the papers instead of reading about the papers and it was humbling.
Rodent study. Always a rodent study. I’m not saying that makes it worthless, I’m saying I wish people led with it.
Interested in actual experiences, and please say when you’re guessing.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
Yes, and the same page has the older cycle for comparison.
This.
The figure everyone quotes traces back to a single 2019 paper with n=8. It gets cited as though it were established and it is really not.
Exactly right.
The people who get burned are almost never the ones who asked questions first.
ha, fair
IR IrisDiary Mod ·
To answer the methodology question directly, Purity & Testing carries 25% because it is the dimension we can measure most reliably. The full weighting is published on the methodology page.