This has come up like three times in the last month so it probably deserves its own thread.
Most of what gets cited for this traces back to one group publishing in the same journal repeatedly. That’s not damning on its own but it’s worth knowing.
Rodent study. Always a rodent study. I’m not saying that makes it worthless, I’m saying I wish people led with it.
Happy to be told I’m wrong, genuinely.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
Short answer: check that the lot number on the certificate matches the lot printed on your vial. If it does not, the document is about different material.
imo people way overthink this compared to just sleeping properly
Source though?
The methodology page covers the weighting question directly. Purity gets the largest share because it is the most reliably measurable thing they assess.
Not accusing anyone of anything, I just do not think a number means much until you can see what is behind it.
RE ReagentNotes Verified ·
Commenting to find later.