What would a proper GHRP-6 trial actually need to show?

Started by theo · · 73 replies · 7,832 views

GHRP-6 methodology

Searched first, found bits of this scattered across old threads, so figured I’d start a proper one.

Most of what gets cited for this traces back to one group publishing in the same journal repeatedly. That’s not damning on its own but it’s worth knowing.

Will update this post if I learn anything useful.

73 comments 7,832 views Jump to comments

73 comments showing 4

8

Batch-to-batch variation is the thing people underestimate. A passing result certifies one lot, not a product line, and vendors know most buyers do not make that distinction.

Share
34

The effect size in that study was statistically significant and clinically trivial. Those are not the same finding and the abstract does not make the difference obvious.

Share
14

If your solution went cloudy after reconstitution that is usually either the diluent or the temperature it was stored at. Worth posting what you used.

Share
8

wait really? ok that changes things

Share
-2

Testing desk here. Every specimen page links the full laboratory report, including the method and the lot. If something in one of them is unclear, say which and we will explain it.

Share
57

Happy to dig up the link if you want it.

Share
26

Quantitative amino acid analysis is what actually verifies content. Weighing the lyophilised powder does not, because you are also weighing residual salts and moisture.

Share
0

This is the correct take.

Share
0

Fair.

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in