Long post, sorry. TL;DR at the bottom if you don’t want the whole thing.
Spent an evening trying to actually read the papers instead of reading about the papers and it was humbling.
The gap between what the study measured and what people claim it showed is genuinely enormous.
Most of what gets cited for this traces back to one group publishing in the same journal repeatedly. That’s not damning on its own but it’s worth knowing.
The part I keep getting stuck on is that everyone’s confident and nobody agrees, which usually means the evidence is thinner than the discussion.
TL;DR: Testagen might be fine, might not, and the way to tell apart seems to be documentation rather than price. Would appreciate other perspectives.
PE PeptideExplorer ·
Was just about to ask this.