Institute Insulin-Like Peptide 5 results thread, discussion

Started by PriyaReport Verified · · 23 replies · 2,813 views

Figured I’d write this up while it’s fresh.

What I want to know is how much of the difference between vendors is real and how much is just measurement noise.

Tried to verify a COA myself by emailing the lab on it. Never heard back. Not sure if that means anything.

The Institute testing page has 1 published Insulin-Like Peptide 5 report if you want actual numbers rather than vibes.

Thanks in advance, this community is usually pretty good about this stuff.

23 comments 2,813 views Jump to comments

23 comments showing 6

0

ok this actually explains something that confused me for ages, thanks

Share
51

Noted, thanks.

Share
0

Exactly right.

Share
-4

Fair.

Share
65

wait so does that mean the coa is basically useless? genuine q

Share
35

Been doing this about four years. The vendors that publish batch documents are the ones that hold up. That is basically the whole heuristic and it has not failed me yet.

Share
2

Yep. Nothing new under the sun.

Share
0

Yes, and the same page has the older cycle for comparison.

Share
14

The figure everyone quotes traces back to a single 2019 paper with n=8. It gets cited as though it were established and it is really not.

Share
1

Where do you even start with reading the actual papers? They may as well be in another language.

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in