This happened to me last month and I still don’t totally know what to make of it.
Tried to verify a COA myself by emailing the lab on it. Never heard back. Not sure if that means anything.
I keep seeing people wave COAs around like they settle the argument. They don’t, and I say that as someone who used to do exactly that.
The Institute testing page has 4 published Survodutide reports if you want actual numbers rather than vibes.
Will update this post if I learn anything useful.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
Worth separating two things here. Purity tells you what fraction of the material is the target compound. Identity tells you whether the target compound is what the label says. A product can pass one and fail the other, and they are different assays.
The specimen reports link out to the full lab document, including the method and the lot number. Took me a while to notice they were clickable.
Institute account. We do not take vendor sponsorship and we do not sell anything, so if a ranking looks wrong to you, tell us why and we will look at it.
The people who get burned are almost never the ones who asked questions first.
Been saying this for years.
VI VialData · · 23 found helpful
Plausible mechanism is not evidence of effect. That distinction gets lost in about 90% of threads here.