Why is Prostamax quantity accuracy tested less often than purity?

Started by IrisDiary Moderator · · 15 replies · 1,854 views

Prostamax testing

Searched first, found bits of this scattered across old threads, so figured I’d start a proper one.

Tried to verify a COA myself by emailing the lab on it. Never heard back. Not sure if that means anything.

What I want to know is how much of the difference between vendors is real and how much is just measurement noise.

Worth noting there’s 1 published Prostamax report published, which is more than I expected honestly.

Thanks in advance, this community is usually pretty good about this stuff.

15 comments 1,854 views Jump to comments

15 comments showing 6

52

Solid write up.

Share
-1

ngl i had the exact opposite experience but ok

Share
0

Still not convinced but I take the point.

Share
75

Same.

Share
48

Happy to dig up the link if you want it.

Share
8

yeah exactly this

Share
39

For anyone arriving from search: the compound reference page has the evidence grading, and the testing tab has the actual results. Two different things, easy to conflate.

Share
16

If your solution went cloudy after reconstitution that is usually either the diluent or the temperature it was stored at. Worth posting what you used.

Share
86

That is the distinction I was trying to make, said better.

Share
33

Yes, and the same page has the older cycle for comparison.

Share
77

Three anecdotes is not data. It is not nothing either, but it is not data.

Share

Join the discussion

Create a free account to reply, follow this topic and get notifications.

Create account Sign in