Official discussion thread for specimens PI-LAB-2026-0006 and PI-LAB-2026-0007. Both lab reports are linked from the testing database. Keep discussion evidence-based; unsupported claims about other companies will be removed.
No replies yet. Be the first to add one.
Read both chromatograms. Three major unidentified peaks at 61% main-peak purity is not degradation — degradation gives you predictable related substances. This looks like failed synthesis or wrong material entirely.
Agree with the failed-synthesis read. Also note the two lots failed at different labs — the "lab error" defense does not survive that design. This is why the confirmation protocol exists.
Their dispute statement claims a third-party COA showing 98%. Has anyone traced the COA lab? The report number format does not match that laboratory’s published scheme.
Moderator note: the COA authenticity question has been forwarded to the testing desk. Do not contact the laboratory directly, please.
Update: the company has not submitted a retest sample within the dispute window. Status remains under active review; score consequences are documented on the company profile.
